×

Šriftas:

Fonas:

Iliustracijos:

Office of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures of the Republic of Lithuania
  • LT
  • EN
Back

Ombudsman

Loreta Tauginienė

Ombudswoman for academic ethics and procedures

CV Ombudsperson agenda

Decisions

Date, No. Title
13/07/2021
No. SP-9		 Decision related to ethics in research performance (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė, K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: research performance, research paper, plagiarism
02/07/2021
No. SP-8		 Decision related to procedural violations of the Commission for Assessment and Recruitment at a University of Applied Sciences (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: position of associate professor, tenure, assessment, recruitment organising
16/06/2021
No. SP-7		 Decision related to violations of research and professional ethics (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: final Master's paper, supervisor, student, scientific paper, co-author
09/06/2021
No. SP-6		 Decision related to the complaint of 11 November 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: academic freedom, right to expression, staff regulations
02/06/2021
No. SP-5		 Decision related to the complaint of 11 November 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: research data, data collection, data embezzlement, research data management, authorship
28/05/2021
No. SP-4		 Decision related to procedural violations of appointment to the position of associate professor (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: position of associate professor, announcement of public call
04/05/2021
No. SP-3		 Decision related to violations of transfer (approval) of academic achievements (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: transfer (approval) of part-time academic achievements, curricula, evaluation of compliance with curricula
29/04/2021
No. SP-2		 Decision related to the complaint of 16 November 2020 and the report of 20 November 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: application of a candidate, work experience, scientific degree
01/02/2021
No. SP-1		 Decision related to the complaint of 14 December 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: entrant, admission to a higher education institution, rules, study program, informing, sending to a specific institution
22/12/2020
No. SP-23		 Decision related to the report of 4 November 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: humiliation, publicity of confidential information, unfair competition
18/12/2020
No. SP-22		 Decision related to organisation and execution of distance learning in a higher education institution (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: distance learning, means of organising studies, approval of e-module
11/12/2020
No. SP-21		 Decision related to indication of authorship in a publication (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, use of research data, authorship, technical corrections
11/12/2020
No. SP-20		 Decision related to participation of researchers in commissioned research (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, business sector, commissioned research, cooperation agreement, use of institutional affiliation
02/12/2020
No. SP-19		 Decision related to violations of Academic Council of a university of applied sciences (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, Academic Council, public call, position of associate professor, interim director
23/10/2020
No. SP-18		 Decision related to violations of academic ethics in an application for launching a new study programme (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, application for launching a new study programme, plagiarism, citation, biased data interpretation
14/10/2020
No. SP-17		 Decision related to the complaint of 22 June 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university, CV, institutional affiliation, award of a pedagogical title
13/10/2020
No. SP-16		 Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a research report (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, research report, citation, plagiarism, data manipulation
05/10/2020
No. SP-15		 Decision related to a research proposal (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: research proposal, academic integrity, research paper, text-matches
14/08/2020
No. SP-14		 Decision related to research proposals (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: research proposal, text-matches, principal investigator, copyright, intellectual property
23/07/2020
No. SP-12		 Decision related to violations of academic ethics in the handbook (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: handbook, plagiarism, deception
The court annulled the decision and made an obligation to re-handle the complaint. A new decision is under development.
26/05/2020
No. SP-8		 Decision related to authorship of a Master's Final Paper Supervisor (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: Master's final paper, supervisor, student, scientific article, co-author
Decision annulled by the court. The complaint re-handled and a new decision has been taken (re. 16/06/2021 No. SP-7).
13/03/2020
No. SP-4		 Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a doctoral dissertation (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university, doctoral dissertation, dissertation-based scientific publications, citation, indication of primary sources, indication of secondary sources
Legal proceedings are pending.
28/09/2018
No. SP-9		 Decision related to violations of academic ethics of a professor and an associate professor (Investigated by: R. Juras, G. Litvinaitytė)

Keywords: commissioned research, business sector
17/10/2017
No. SP-22		 Decision related to [A. A.]'s violation of academic ethics (Investigated by: G. Litvinaitytė, R. Juras)

Information on the decision-making shall be published in the “Decisions” section on the Office’s website immediately after it has been made. The decision shall be published after the deadline for submitting an appeal of the decision of 30 days, and shall be posted for one year after its  publication. If a decision in appealed with court in the course of legal proceedings, the decision shall not be made public, and the calculation of the one-year term shall start from the effective date of the final procedural decision of the court.

In order to ensure the protection of personal data, the published decisions of the Ombudsperson shall contain solely the information necessary to achieve the aim pursued.

(art. 34 and 35 of Recommendations for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Reports at the Initiative of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures) VALID UNTIL 12 JULY 2021

Updated: 2 August 2021