| Date, No. | Title |
|---|---|
| 12/06/2025 No. SP-4 |
Concerning the complaint of March 17 2025
Key words: misconduct, inaction, specialty exam, study regulations, expulsion, ethics committee, appeal |
| 10/06/2025 No. SP-3 |
Concerning the complaint of April 8 2021
Key words: university, academic ethics, academic misconduct, plagiarism |
| 06/03/2025 No. SP-2 |
Concerning the complaint of 17 February 2025
Key words: academic ethics, procedures, disability, description, procedure, legislation, convention, competition |
| 06/02/2025 No. SP-1 |
Concerning the complaint of 4 December 2024
Key words: competition, researcher, institute, appeal board, seminar |
In order to ensure the protection of personal data, the published decisions of the Ombudsperson shall contain solely the information necessary to achieve the aim pursued.
(art. 34 and 35 of Recommendations for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Reports at the Initiative of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures) VALID UNTIL 12 JULY 2021
The depersonalised information about the decision (decision’s title, number, date of adoption, and keywords) shall be announced immediately in section “Decisions” on the Office’s website. When the appeal term of 30 days matures, the decision shall be depersonalised and downloaded not later than within 10 workdays. The depersonalised decision shall be available in section “Decisions” on the Office’s website for one year after it has been downloaded. If the decision is appealed, the depersonalised decision shall not be publicly available in the course of the proceedings, and the term of one year shall be calculated from the day when the final procedural judgment enters into effect. The decision shall be depersonalised by the investigator, who has prepared its draft, or by another employee of the Office assigned by the ombudsperson, in accordance with the Rules for the Implementation of the Rights of Data Subjects in the Office of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures of the Republic of Lithuania. The published depersonalised decision shall be removed if the information about its appeal is learnt after its publishing.
To ensure the protection of personal data, the published decisions of the Ombudsperson shall contain solely the information necessary to achieve the aim pursued. In order to avoid the person’s recognition, the fictitious initials of the person shall be used in the decision’s text. The precise names of institutions, units and job titles shall not be used together.
(art. 30 and 31 of Procedure of Complaints Handling and Investigations at the Initiative of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures) VALID FROM 13 JULY 2021
Updated: 10 November 2025