×

Šriftas:

Fonas:

Iliustracijos:

Decisions

Date, No. Title
22/12/2020
No. SP-23
Decision related to the report of 4 November 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: humiliation, publicity of confidential information, unfair competition

18/12/2020
No. SP-22
Decision related to organisation and execution of distance learning in a higher education institution (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: distance learning, means of organising studies, approval of e-module

11/12/2020
No. SP-21
Decision related to indication of authorship in a publication (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, use of research data, authorship, technical corrections

11/12/2020
No. SP-20
Decision related to participation of researchers in commissioned research (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, business sector, commissioned research, cooperation agreement, use of institutional affiliation

02/12/2020
No. SP-19
Decision related to violations of Academic Council of a university of applied sciences (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, Academic Council, public call, position of associate professor, interim director

23/10/2020
No. SP-18
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in an application for launching a new study programme (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, application for launching a new study programme, plagiarism, citation, biased data interpretation

14/10/2020
No. SP-17
Decision related to the complaint of 22 June 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university, CV, institutional affiliation, award of a pedagogical title

13/10/2020
No. SP-16
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a research report (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, research report, citation, plagiarism, data manipulation

05/10/2020
No. SP-15
Decision related to a research proposal (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: research proposal, academic integrity, research paper, text-matches

14/08/2020
No. SP-14
Decision related to research proposals (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: research proposal, text-matches, principal investigator, copyright, intellectual property

31/07/2020
No. SP-13
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the complaint of 31 May 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: electronic correspondence, humiliating information, foreign student

23/07/2020
No. SP-12
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in the handbook (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: handbook, plagiarism, deception

03/07/2020
No. SP-11
Decision related to the report of 6 December 2019 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: doctoral dissertation, research ethics, statistical methods, data analysis

02/07/2020
No. SP-10
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the complaint of 13 May 2020 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: Academic ethics commission, composition of Academic ethics commission, term for handling complaints

23/06/2020
No. SP-9
Decision related to a lecturer's public speeches (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: lecturer,public speeches, attitudes, beliefs, students'rights, academic freedom

26/05/2020
No. SP-8
Decision related to authorship of a Master's Final Paper Supervisor (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: Master's final paper, supervisor, student, scientific article, co-author

07/05/2020
No. SP-7
Decision related to the complaint of 24 February 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, doctoral studies, doctoral committee member, meeting of admission into doctoral studies, aggression, animosity, personal qualities

24/04/2020
No. SP-6
Decision related to the complaint of 13 December 2019 (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university, doctoral studies, annual evaluation, exclusion from university, scientific supervision, doctoral committee

13/03/2020
No. SP-5
Decision related to research ethics (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: institute, researcher, research ethics, publication ethics, scientific publication

13/03/2020
No. SP-4
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a doctoral dissertation (Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)

Keywords: university, doctoral dissertation, dissertation-based scientific publications, citation, indication of primary sources, indication of secondary sources

28/02/2020
No. SP-3
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the report of 20 December 2019 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university of applied sciences, employee's rights, study process

13/02/2020
No. SP-2
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the report of 6 January 2020 (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, Master's final paper, plagiarism, veracity

17/01/2020
No. SP-1
Decision related to the complaint of 8 November 2019 by T. G. (Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)

Keywords: university, submission of documents, document formatting rules

28/05/2019
No. SP-10
Decision related to violations of academic ethics and procedures at Vilnius University (Investigated by: G. Litvinaitytė)

Keywords: Vilnius University, central academic ethics commission, academic freedom

28/09/2018
No. SP-9
Decision related to violations of academic ethics of a professor and an associate professor (Investigated by: R. Juras, G. Litvinaitytė)

Keywords: commissioned research, business sector

20/02/2018
No. SP-1
Decision related to violations of academic ethics of a professor and a doctoral student (Investigated by: G. Litvinaitytė, R. Juras)

Keywords: plagiarism, co-authorship

Information on the decision-making shall be published in the “Decisions” section on the Office’s website immediately after it has been made. The decision shall be published after the deadline for submitting an appeal of the decision of 30 days, and shall be posted for one year after its  publication. If a decision in appealed with court in the course of legal proceedings, the decision shall not be made public, and the calculation of the one-year term shall start from the effective date of the final procedural decision of the court.

In order to ensure the protection of personal data, the published decisions of the Ombudsperson shall contain solely the information necessary to achieve the aim pursued.

(art. 34 and 35 of Recommendations for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Reports at the Initiative of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures)

Updated: 30 December 2020