| Date, No. | Title |
|---|---|
| 01/02/2021 No. SP-1 |
Decision related to the complaint of 14 December 2020
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: entrant, admission to a higher education institution, rules, study program, informing, sending to a specific institution |
| 22/12/2020 No. SP-23 |
Decision related to the report of 4 November 2020
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: humiliation, publicity of confidential information, unfair competition |
| 18/12/2020 No. SP-22 |
Decision related to organisation and execution of distance learning in a higher education institution
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: distance learning, means of organising studies, approval of e-module |
| 11/12/2020 No. SP-21 |
Decision related to indication of authorship in a publication
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: university, use of research data, authorship, technical corrections |
| 11/12/2020 No. SP-20 |
Decision related to participation of researchers in commissioned research
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: university, business sector, commissioned research, cooperation agreement, use of institutional affiliation |
| 02/12/2020 No. SP-19 |
Decision related to violations of Academic Council of a university of applied sciences
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university of applied sciences, Academic Council, public call, position of associate professor, interim director |
| 23/10/2020 No. SP-18 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in an application for launching a new study programme
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university of applied sciences, application for launching a new study programme, plagiarism, citation, biased data interpretation |
| 14/10/2020 No. SP-17 |
Decision related to the complaint of 22 June 2020
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university, CV, institutional affiliation, award of a pedagogical title |
| 13/10/2020 No. SP-16 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a research report
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university of applied sciences, research report, citation, plagiarism, data manipulation |
| 05/10/2020 No. SP-15 |
Decision related to a research proposal
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: research proposal, academic integrity, research paper, text-matches |
| 14/08/2020 No. SP-14 |
Decision related to research proposals
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: research proposal, text-matches, principal investigator, copyright, intellectual property |
| 31/07/2020 No. SP-13 |
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the complaint of 31 May 2020
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: electronic correspondence, humiliating information, foreign student |
| 23/07/2020 No. SP-12 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in the handbook
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: handbook, plagiarism, deception |
| 03/07/2020 No. SP-11 |
Decision related to the report of 6 December 2019
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: doctoral dissertation, research ethics, statistical methods, data analysis |
| 02/07/2020 No. SP-10 |
Decision related to the termination of an investigation of the complaint of 13 May 2020
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: Academic ethics commission, composition of Academic ethics commission, term for handling complaints |
| 23/06/2020 No. SP-9 |
Decision related to a lecturer's public speeches
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: lecturer,public speeches, attitudes, beliefs, students'rights, academic freedom |
| 26/05/2020 No. SP-8 |
Decision related to authorship of a Master's Final Paper Supervisor
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: Master's final paper, supervisor, student, scientific article, co-author |
| 07/05/2020 No. SP-7 |
Decision related to the complaint of 24 February 2020
(Investigated by: K. Pažusytė)
Keywords: university, doctoral studies, doctoral committee member, meeting of admission into doctoral studies, aggression, animosity, personal qualities |
| 24/04/2020 No. SP-6 |
Decision related to the complaint of 13 December 2019
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university, doctoral studies, annual evaluation, exclusion from university, scientific supervision, doctoral committee |
| 13/03/2020 No. SP-4 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics in a doctoral dissertation
(Investigated by: K. Kapočiūtė)
Keywords: university, doctoral dissertation, dissertation-based scientific publications, citation, indication of primary sources, indication of secondary sources |
| 28/05/2019 No. SP-10 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics and procedures at Vilnius University
(Investigated by: G. Litvinaitytė)
Keywords: Vilnius University, central academic ethics commission, academic freedom |
| 28/09/2018 No. SP-9 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics of a professor and an associate professor
(Investigated by: R. Juras, G. Litvinaitytė)
Keywords: commissioned research, business sector |
| 20/02/2018 No. SP-1 |
Decision related to violations of academic ethics of a professor and a doctoral student
(Investigated by: G. Litvinaitytė, R. Juras)
Keywords: plagiarism, co-authorship |
Information on the decision-making shall be published in the “Decisions” section on the Office’s website immediately after it has been made. The decision shall be published after the deadline for submitting an appeal of the decision of 30 days, and shall be posted for one year after its publication. If a decision in appealed with court in the course of legal proceedings, the decision shall not be made public, and the calculation of the one-year term shall start from the effective date of the final procedural decision of the court.
In order to ensure the protection of personal data, the published decisions of the Ombudsperson shall contain solely the information necessary to achieve the aim pursued.
(art. 34 and 35 of Recommendations for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Reports at the Initiative of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures)
Updated: 15 March 2021
